This research is essential to ascertain democratic model on decision-making at deliberations of development
planning. Based on the observation, suggested programs from deliberations of development planningat Tellu Limpoe
district, Sidenreng Rappang regency sometimes were not realized. As a result, the attendance of invited people at next
deliberations of development planning was small. The lack of people's attendance caused the dominance of district
government on decision-making. Besides, one of the most complicated characteristics on decision-making process at
deliberations of development planningwas uncertainty where there is no evidence of what would happen next on
program establishment. This problematic characteristic can be solved through observation, questionnaire, interview
and literary study which is related to this field. This research's model is descriptive qualitative. The result of the
research shows that democratic model on decision-making consisted of liberal democracy with grade 65,8% which
was considered most influential by the respondents, guided democracy with grade 38,4% which was considered least
influential by the respondents, social democracy with grade 42,8% and was considered influential enough,
participative democracy with grade 43,4% and also was considered influential enough, constitutional democracy with
grade 62,8% which was considered highly influential on decision-making